We ultimately have a name for Samsung’s teased tri-fold phone

A number of months earlier, we initially listened to reports concerning Samsung’s claimed tri-fold phone– a gadget that would certainly match the Huawei Companion XT– after leaker Yeux1122 shared details on a South Oriental social media sites web page. Since exact same informant is back with an expected name for the item: the Samsung Galaxy G Layer. He additionally recommends a launch home window of January 2026 based upon details offered by Ross Youthful, a supply chain expert whose understandings have actually resulted in numerous very early discloses, although Yeux1122 explains that some resources recommend a late 2025 launch.

The Galaxy G Layer will certainly be 9.96 inches vast and 6.54 inches high,according to Yuex1122’s blog post on Naver The tool will certainly be a bit various from existing mobile phones because it folds up on both sides, and he claims “Weight has to do with the like H, yet a little thicker.” We presume this is a referral to the Huawei Companion XT, among the only various other trifold phones on the marketplace. It considers 298 grams or 10.51 ounces– dramatically larger than various other front runner tools like the apple iphone 16 Pro Max. The weight can be a disadvantage, particularly if the layout is also large.

The “G” in the name can describe its joint system. The G Layer could be a double-folding phone, where the display flexes inwards from the left and best sides to shield it versus scrapes; certainly, this would certainly imply a second display on the back of the tool will certainly be needed. That layout would certainly lead to a rather thicker tool, although the distinction in dimension is most likely to be much less than a millimeter.

There aren’t lots of tri-fold phones to contrast versus or aim to as an examples. The Huawei Companion XT released virtually $2,800. The Galaxy S25 Ultra begins at $1,300 for the design with the most affordable specifications, so a tri-fold can conveniently damage the $2,000 mark. The biggest obstacle Samsung requires to get rid of right now is the cost; few customers would certainly agree to purchase such a pricey, yet utmost unverified, tool.