UserBenchmark suggests you purchase the i5-13600K over the Ryzen 7 9800X3D — says AMD drives gross sales with ‘aggressive advertising and marketing’ relatively than ‘real-world efficiency’

If you purchase by means of hyperlinks on our articles, Future and its syndication companions might earn a fee.

UserBenchmark – the present that retains on giving! The web site’s newest evaluate of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D has left many in shock because it now deems spending additional on a gaming CPU pointless. Persevering with its endless saga of denouncing AMD, which it usually refers to as “Superior Advertising Gadgets,” UserBenchmark doubles down and names the i5-13600K and i5-14600K as worthy rivals, though AMD’s Ryzen 7 9800X3D has dethroned Intel’s quickest gaming CPU, the i9-14900K, by virtually 33% per our testing.

This isn’t the primary time we have encountered such an ‘intriguing’ take from UserBenchmark. The web site has been in sizzling water for rating the i3-8100 higher than the i9-9980XE merely based mostly on clock speeds — make that make sense. A fast have a look at its CPU rating chart based mostly on efficiency from highest to lowest places the Ryzen 7 9800X3D on the twelfth spot, trailed by the “3D joker” Ryzen 9 7950X3D on the twenty fifth place. The Ryzen 9 9950X follows swimsuit, touchdown within the twenty eighth place. Irrespective of the way you have a look at it – whether or not or not it’s gaming, productiveness, or effectivity – lovers overwhelmingly suppose these numbers merely do not add up.

Shifting over to their precise evaluate, it does not take an knowledgeable to discern truth from fiction. UserBenchmark asserts that the X3D design ends in a 6% deduction in clock speeds however fails to handle AMD’s redesign of the stacking hierarchy, which helps scale back the impression of this clock velocity deficit, even in single-core scenarios. Higher but, the 9800X3D can sustain with the non-X3D 9700X in lots of manufacturing workloads.

The location additional states that “AMD is trying to drive demand by means of aggressive advertising and marketing relatively than delivering real-world efficiency,” though the 9800X3D at the moment unanimously stands because the world’s quickest gaming CPU – beating Intel’s Core Extremely 9 285K by virtually 40%. UserBenchmark then suggests customers select the i5-13600K/14600K since spending greater than $200 on gaming CPUs is “pointless,” however that could be a purely subjective assertion. As well as, the precise efficiency, effectivity, and platform variations between the i5-14600K and the 9800X3D are elements UserBenchmark did not think about.

UserBenchmark’s total argument pivots across the proposition that sooner CPUs are “pointless” for gaming. It’s the identical as saying that you just should not get something sooner than an RTX 3050 for the reason that human eye clearly cannot see previous 60 FPS – sarcasm meant. Evidently, lovers are having a area day with this evaluate.